Pandan valley uses only ordinary resolution to approve a new common facility

[beau 0]

Pandan valley uses a ordinary resolution to approve a new facility of community garden at AGM this year by claiming because they csn merge two resolutions into one and it’s only for 1 year so only need ordinary resolution.

Is that legal?

The resolution is proposed by a council member. She and her council members friends gathered more than 45% of the votes including proxy and purposely arrange the online AGM on Saturday afternoon when rarely people are at home. So they passed the resolution at 55%.

So now it’s a precedent that anyone can anyhow merge two resolutions together so any condo can get any common facility passed in AGM by ordinary resolution as long as they claim it’s only for a year..