Id's Feedback

[Babysiu 0]

Hi all,

We bought a 4-room flat and going to renovate our hse. I have consulted these 6 IDs. Please feel free to share your comments if you have encounter anyone of them before. Thanks!

1. Brickz - Tampanies

2. G-Plan - IMM

3. * - Tradehub

4. City Design - IMM

5. Hua Li - Beauty world center

6. U Home. IMM

[blazing 0]

Hi all,

We bought a 4-room flat and going to renovate our hse. I have consulted these 6 IDs. Please feel free to share your comments if you have encounter anyone of them before. Thanks!

1. Brickz - Tampanies

2. G-Plan - IMM

3. * - Tradehub

4. City Design - IMM

5. Hua Li - Beauty world center

6. U Home. IMM

I went to *, the guy attended to us is pretty decent. But not sure if we want to take up cos the design they displayed on the albums were not what we wanted. Somehow we find their design not suiting our taste buds. Pricing slightly higher, but may be there workmanship is good? I am not sure.

Edited May 27, 2011 by blazing

[blazing 0]

Strange, not able to type out North West in my above post!

[buoyant9090 0]

Edited June 14, 2011 by buoyant9090

[GrandReno 0]

Yes, I saw one of the topic on Ciseern some time back in renotalk. A lot of hidden cost, expensive and workmanship so so only. Many poor feedback. But now the forum is begin removed, I suspect, Ciseern had ask the admin to remove so no one can read.

You posted 3 identical comments above on 3 separate threads which are not relevant to the ID company mentioned.

Your motive is.... ?

[CiseernAdmin 0]

Yes, I saw one of the topic on Ciseern some time back in renotalk. A lot of hidden cost, expensive and workmanship so so only. Many poor feedback. But now the forum is begin removed, I suspect, Ciseern had ask the admin to remove so no one can read.

Dear all,

I am from Ciseern and would like to clarify some matters.

First of all, the tread on Ciseern was closed by Renotalk's Administrator and not at the request of Ciseern. The reason may be because there is an investigation of defamation going on.

We are suspecting that someone is using different usernames to post negative remarks to defame Ciseern. So far there are 3 usernames being investigated and others still going on. The 3 usernames are 1) magma 2) sufferer87 3) truth0007. The findings are: -

1) magma posting on Apr 7 2011 at 11:17pm & truth0007 posting on Apr 8 2011 at 12:01am shared the same IP Address 116.15.72.181

2) truth0007 posting on Apr 8 2011 at 3:58pm & sufferer87 posting on Apr 8 2011 at 8:46pm shared the same IP Address 116.15.191.59

3) sufferer87 posting on Apr 13 2011 at 6:48am & truth0007 posting on Apr 13 2011 at 9:04am shared the same IP Address 49.245.92.234

With such findings, we strongly believed that the 3 users are of the same person, or from the same computer or at least from the same internet environment. Further actions will be taken after we got reply from Singnet Broadband the identities of theses IP Addresses.

We had already requested Renotalk Administrator to put Ciseern's tread back and reveal the same findings. Meanwhile, as investigation is still on going, we will not comment further till investigation is completed.

Thank you for reading this and do post truly.

CiseernAdmin

[truth0007 0]

I would like to clarify that these users (magma, sufferer87, truth0007, buoyant9090) belong to the same person.

What was written in this forum was made out of impulse due to miscommunication between Ciseern and me.

I sincerely apologise for my actions and would like to withdraw all remarks made against Ciseern.

[in35335 0]

really asking for trouble.